Monday, February 22, 2010

Nuclear waste likely to be dumped in NT


Muckaty Station, north of Tennant Creek (ABC News: ABC News)

Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson has revealed Muckaty Station, about 120 kilometres north of Tennant Creek, as the location the Federal Government will pursue for a national radioactive waste repository.

"We will proceed firstly with the only voluntary site that we have, and that goes to the Ngapa land with respect to the Muckaty Station," he told 105.7 ABC Darwin.

Mr Ferguson said several sites preferred by the Howard government would no longer be pursued.

"We have knocked out the three sites which were not volunteered by the community but were determined by politicians in Canberra," he said.

This is "despite the fact that scientifically they actually stack up".

Should environmental and scientific assessments fail at the Muckaty site, Mr Ferguson said the nuclear waste dump could be located elsewhere in Australia.

"I also have the capacity, if I assess that that is not a proper site, to then open up to a national voluntary site nomination process."

Mr Ferguson said the Government would this week repeal Howard government legislation that would have enabled it to force the waste dump on the Northern Territory.

He said radioactive waste stored at the site would not be linked to Australia's uranium exports, but to isotopes used in medical treatments.

He said the Muckaty site had been nominated by the Northern Land Council, however he acknowledged that some traditional owners were not in agreement.

"Clearly there are some differences in terms of the Muckaty Land Trust."

He said before the site could be approved as a waste dump, the Northern Land Council would "have to prove that it's been done in accordance with the law of the Northern Territory".

He said a final decision on the dump site would still take a long time.

"If the science stacks up, and if it meets environmental approvals - but thirdly and more importantly, it obtains the necessary approval from the Ngapa people, through the Northern Land Council - then it will potentially be the appropriate site."

Natalie Wasley from the Beyond Nuclear Initiative says the decision is extremely disappointing.

"There is an agreement that was made between the Northern Land Council, the Federal Government and some traditional owners of the land trust," she said.

"This agreement has never been made public and there's been a number of documents submitted by other traditional owners calling for the contract and the agreement to be made public so they can see what's actually been agreed upon for their country.

"It's a very contested nomination."

A woman representing some traditional owners of the Muckaty Land Trust says she wants the Federal Resources Minister to visit her country before making decisions about a nuclear waste facility.

Dianne Stokes represents the area's Miyilwayi traditional owners and says any past agreement with the Ngapa people is not valid.

"I want to get the traditional owners together, talk about it and maybe have a ceremony to show Martin Ferguson who we are, because he didn't come when we asked him," she said.

"We've written him a letter to come.

"He never came towards us, he never came and faced us, he never came and talked to us.

"None of the people, not even the NLC, came and talked to the traditional owners."

2 comments:

  1. Summary:
    It is found that government had secretly planned to make the Muckaty Station a national radioactive waste repository despite knowing the fact that waste nuclear materials do carry potential risk to local people. The agreement was only made secretly between the Northern Land Council, the Federal Government and some traditional owners of the land trust and still there are traditional owners diagree such agreement.

    Critique:
    Nuclear waste has always risen a controversal issue to be discusssed. Just imagine what will you feel when there is nuclear waste is dumped just besides your house. Then another issue may be arised this time, if it is not to be dumped beside your house, then where should it be? Others people house? Since it emits harmful radioactive radiation. More than that, it is hard to find a scientifically appropriate site for nuclear waste dumping site to make sure that it is safe and protected eternally.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No doubt that it is an controversial issue. we cannot deny that it is very effective to generate power. Only a little of uranium is needed to generate the power as we now generated..:).Anyway, proper and cautious way of handling its waste should be further investigate to ensure the safety of the world. We don't want the tragic happen onto japan during WWII to be repeated...It leaves long term side effects even over generations. It is really a tragic...

    ReplyDelete